com.taraji.psg a écrit:Afficher toutAh en plus de voir de la laicité partout même là où il y en a pas, t'es un expert en religions ?
Ton explication sur la phrase affichée sur les dollars est ridicule.
Si ça te fait plaisir j'ai relu l'article, je n'ai pas trouvé la phrase qui dit que les Etats Unis sont laics, par contre il est dit qu'il y a la liberté de religion, personne n'a prétendu le contraire jusqu'à présent.
Voila comment est defini la laicite au USA. Et c le premier article de la constitution:
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment is the first of several pronouncements in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, stating that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". Together with the Free Exercise Clause ("... or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"), these two clauses make up what are called the "religion clauses" of the First Amendment.[1]
The establishment clause has generally been interpreted to prohibit 1) the establishment of a national religion by Congress, or 2) the preference by the U.S. government of one religion over another. The first approach is called the "separation" or "no aid" interpretation, while the second approach is called the "non-preferential" or "accommodation" interpretation. The accommodation interpretation prohibits Congress from preferring one religion over another, but does not prohibit the government's entry into religious domain to make accommodations in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.
The clause itself was seen as a reaction to the Church of England, established as the official church of England and some of the colonies, during the colonial era. It possibly could have been thought up of as a consensus to the diversity of religions in the U.S. at the time of the Constitution's creation.
